Compare AI models: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.7 Code | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 32/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.95/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$4.00/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.19/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
159K
19K
Completed sessions
578,643
52,934
Token share
0.11%
0.01%
Tokens
1.3T-45%
116B+100%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.2%14K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 Code·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 Code·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini