Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| GPT-5.6 Luna | 67/100 | 81/100 | 63/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 64/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.00/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$0.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
15K
543K
Completed sessions
274,233
2,107,154
Token share
0.01%
0.58%
Tokens
105B+100%
5.5T+135%
AUG 13OCT 7
AUG 13OCT 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
55.3%49K user-weeks