Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 74/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.12/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.9M
1M
Completed sessions
103,118,617
15,483,925
Token share
37.2%
2.76%
Tokens
445T+100%
33T-31%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
62.5%83K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba Mini