Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	55/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Beam 1.0 501B A23B	50/100	88/100	100/100	92/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.00/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.00/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

57K

185K

Completed sessions

822,894

3,946,155

Token share

0.2%

0.82%

Tokens

2.4T+100%

9.9T+100%

SEP 2OCT 27

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

63.3%983 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.